RESPONSE OF COCONUT TO INCREASING LEVELS OF LEAF PRUNING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON FARM PRODUCTIVITY

  • S.S. Magat
  • L.H. Canja
  • R.Z. Margate
Keywords: Leaf Pruning, Farm Productivity

Abstract

Effects on nut production and copra (wt/nut and yield/tree of four leaf pruning conditions (LP): control (no LP); LP from leaf 24; leaf 19 and leaf 14 with 31, 23, 18 and 13, remaining leaves on each palm, respectively, was studied on adult bearing palms at the Davao Research Center, Philippine Coconut Authority. As a reference point, leaf 1 is considered as the youngest expanded leaf, while leaf 19, the one supporting the 7‑8 month old developing nuts or buko.

 

Except in the first year of LP of which nut and copra yields under all LP conditions were similar to the unpruned palms, the following second and third years of LP indicated that leaf pruning from leaf 19 or maintaining only the 18 younger, upper leaves of the tree crown strongly showed the capability of the coconut to still support the normal development and maturity of nuts. As a result of LP, sunlight transmission to intercrops increased by about 120% compared to unpruned palms. This was translated to higher intercrop yield of corn (2.16 t increased to 3.71 t/ha) which is strongly attributed to the average 4,000 ft candles of sunlight (190.5 PAR) observed with LP from leaf 19 and the rest of the leaves below.

 

In relation to increased sunlight transmission, intercropping, water economy and drought tolerance, pest and disease control and added income from pruned leaves, implications of LP are pointed out.

References

BAILEY, P. (1977). Effects of artificial defoliation on coconut yield in Papua New Guinea. Papua New Guinea Agric. J. 28 (2/3/4): 39 45.

CALVEZ, (1976). Influences on oil palm yield of pruning at different levels. Oleagineux 31(2): 57 58.

DAS GUPTA, D.K. (1972). Effects of decapitation defoliation, and removing part of the root and shoot on subsequent growth of sugar beet. J. Exp. Bot. 23(94): 93 102.

DETLING, J.K. (1979). Net photosynthesis, root respiration, and regrowth of Bouteloval gracilis following simulated grazing. Oecologia: 41: 127¬134.

DOLAR, S.G. (1961). The environmental factors and cultural practices affecting production of coconut. M.S. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. GIFFORD, R.M. and L.T. EVANS. (1981). Photosynthesis, carbon partitioning and yield. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 32: 485 509.

HAWKINS, A.F. 1982. Light interception, photosynthesis and crop productivity. Outlook in Agric. 2(3): 104 113.

HEICHEL, G.H. and N.C. TURNER. (198S). Carbon dioxide assimilation of primary and regrowth foliages of old maple and red oak. Response to defoliation. Oecologia 57: 14 19.

MAGAT, S.S., V.L. CADIGAL and J.A. HAVANA (1976). Yield improvement of coconut in elevated inland area of Davao (Philippines) by KC1 fertilization. Oleagineux 30(10): 413 416.

MAGAT, S.S., L.M. ALFORJA and L.G. OGUIS. (1988). An estimation of the critical and optimum levels of leaf Cl in bearing coconuts: A guide for foliar diagnosis. Phil. J. Coconut Studies 8(2): 6 10.

MAGAT, S.S. and R.Z. MARGATE (1990). The chlorine needs of coconut. CORD APCC 6(l): 30 51.

MARGATE, R.Z. et al (1978). A long term KC1 fertilization of bearing coconuts in an inland-upland area of Davao. Phil. J. Coconut Studies 3(4): 1 14.

MOONEY, H.A. and S.L. GALMON. (1982). Constraints on leaf structure and function. BioScience 32: 178¬266.

PEREIRA, A.S.R. (1978). Effect of leaf removal in the yield components of sunflower. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 26: 133 144.
Published
1994-12-01
How to Cite
S.S. Magat, L.H. Canja, & R.Z. Margate. (1994). RESPONSE OF COCONUT TO INCREASING LEVELS OF LEAF PRUNING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON FARM PRODUCTIVITY. CORD, 10(02), 34. https://doi.org/10.37833/cord.v10i02.283
Section
Articles