Integrated management of Eriophyid mite, Aceria guerreronis Keifer on coconut in Tamil Nadu, India

  • K. Ramaraju
Keywords: Coconut, Eriophyid mite, integrated management, A. guerreronis, Vermicompost, Neem cake

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Vellalore from January 2002 to December 2004 to evaluate the influence of organic and inorganic nutrients and the effect of botanicals and insecticide against coconut eriophyid mite. Soil application of nutrients along with spraying of Triazophos 40 EC (5 ml/lit.), azadirachtin 1% (5 ml/lit.) and neem oil (30 ml/lit.) as first, second and third round of sprayings, respectively were evaluated. The results revealed that there was a significant reduction in mite population (65%) after two years in the Integrated Management (IM) treated trees (application of organic and inorganic nutrients, basin cultivation of sunnhemp and three rounds of spraying) followed by trees treated with Nitrogen: Phosphorus: Potash (1.3:2.0:3.5 kg/palm/year) + Farm Yard Manure 50 kg/palm/year + neem cake 5 kg /palm/year + micronutrients + three rounds of sprayings (52.8%).  Similarly, there was also a significant reduction in the per cent damaged green nuts after two years. After second year, the per cent damaged nut was lowest (41.9) in the IM treated trees which was statistically on par with treatment 6 (42.9) as against control (71.8). A similar trend was also recorded after third year. IM package treated trees recorded the lowest nut damage grade of 2.8, 2.4 and 2.1 at harvest followed by IM package without sunnhemp as basin crop 3.0, 2.6 and 2.2 as against 4.3, 4.3 and 4.5 in the check after first, second and third year, respectively.

Author Biography

K. Ramaraju

Department of Agricultural Entomology, Centre for Plant Protection Studies, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641 003 India

References

Amrine, Jr. J.W. and Stasny T.S., 1994. Catalog of the Eriophyoidea (Acarina: Prostigmata) of the world. Indira Publishing House, Michigan, USA, p. 804.
Arthur Jacob, J., Nandakumar, C., Naseema Beevi, S., Hebsy Bai and Vrinda. T. S. 2003. Influence of a holistic approach in increasing productivity of coconut eriophyid mite infested palms. In: Proceedings of the National Symposium on Frontier Areas of Entomological Research. Division of Entomology. Indian Agricultural Research Institute. New Delhi. 169-170.
Fernando, L.C.P., Wickramananda, I.R., Aratchige, N.S., 2002. Status of coconut mite, Aceria guerreronis in Sri Lanka, In: In: Fernanado, L.C.P., Moraes, G.J., Wickramanada, I.R (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Coconut Mite (Aceria guerreronis), 6-8 January 2000, Coconut Research Institute, Srin Lanka, pp 1-8.
Gomez, K.A. and A.A. Gomez. 1976. Statistical Procedures for agricultural Research with Special Emphasis on rice. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines. 368 p.
Hernandez, R.F. 1977. Combate quimico del eriofido del cocotero Aceria (Eriophyes) guerreronis (K.) en la costa de Guerrero, Agricultura Tecnica en mexico 4:23-28.

Julia, J.F. and Mariau, D. 1979. Nouvelles recherches en cote’d Ivoire sur Eriophyes guerreronis K., acarien ravageur des noix du cocotier. Oleagineux 34 : 181-89.

Madhavan Nair G., Saradamma. K., Mathew T.B., Naseema Beevi. S. and Anitha. N. 2000. Infestation and management of coconut mite Aceria guerreronis Keifer in Kerala – an overview. Indo Workshop on Innovative Pest and Disease Management in Horticulture and Plantation Crops. Technology Improvement, validation and transfer held at SPIC, Science foundation Chennai, pp 46-57.

Marimuthu, T., Palaniswamy. S. and Ramaraju. K. 2003. Integrated management of coconut eriophyid mite Aceria guerreronis Keifer in Tamil Nadu. In: Coconut eriophyid mite Issues and Strategies, Eds. H.P. Singh and P. Rethinam. Coconut Development Board, Kochi. pp. 81-86.

Mariau, D. 1977. Aceria (Eriophyes) guerreronis an important ravageur des cocoteraies africaines et americaines. Oleagineux, 32: 101-111.

Moore, D. Ridout, M.S. and Alexander. L. 1991. Nutrition of coconuts in St. Lucia and relationship of attack by coconut mite Eriophyes guerreronis Keifer. Trop. Agric. 68: 41-44.
Panda, N. and Khush, G.S. 1995. Host Plant Resistance to Insects. CAB. International, Manila, pp.420.St.Croix, Virigin Islands, USA. pp.128-132.
Rajaram, V and R. Ramamurthy. 2001. Effect of irrigation, nitrogen and potassium on mite incidence and yield of chilli. Ann. Plant Prot. Sci., 9:127-128.
Ramaraju, K., Natarajan, K., Sundara Babu, P.C., Palanisamy, S., Rabinda, R.J., 2002. Studies on coconut eriophyid mite, Aceria guerreronis Keifer in Tamil Nadu, India. In: Fernanado, L.C.P., Moraes, G.J., Wickramanada, I.R (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Coconut Mite (Aceria guerreronis), 6-8 January 2000, Coconut Research Institute, Sri Lanka, pp 13-31.
Snedecor, G.W. and W.G. Cochran.1967. Statistical methods. Oxford and IBH publishing co., New Delhi.593p
Sathiamma, B., Nair, C.P.R. and Koshy, P.K. 1998. Out break of a nut infesting eriophyid mite, Eriophyes guerreronis in coconut plantation in India. Indian coconut J., 29:1-3.
Wilkie, S. 1980. Interim coconut fertilizer recommendations for St. Lucia, Unpublished report, St. Lucia Ministry of Agriculture.
Published
2007-10-01
How to Cite
K. Ramaraju. (2007). Integrated management of Eriophyid mite, Aceria guerreronis Keifer on coconut in Tamil Nadu, India. CORD, 23(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.37833/cord.v23i2.167
Section
Articles