COCONUT GENETIC RESOURCES
Abstract
It is presurned that the generic name, Cocos as well as the popular name coconut are derived from the spanish word ‘coco’ meaning ‘monkey face’ probably a reference to the three sears on the base of the shell resembling a monkey's face (Rosengarten, 1984). The origin of coconut was placed by Martius (1850) on the West Coast of Central America near the Isthmus of Panama. On the basis of evidences for the cultivation of coconut in Sri Lanka by about 300 BC. as well as the discovery of a fossil (Pliocene) Cocos in Newzealand (Hill, 1929) and in the deserts of Rajasthan (Kaul, 1951) the theory of Central American origin has been contested. Early spanish explorers discovered the cultivation of coconut on the Pacific.Coast of Panama in pre‑Columbian times. The first report of appearance of coconut in Western Mexico came around 1540 AD and it is believed to have spread to Mexico in the last decade of the 16th century (Bruman, 1945). It is presurned that coconut might have been carried to Mexico by ocean currents from Polynesia before the discovery of the New World (Purseglove, 1972). The available evidences point to the domestication of coconut in the Indo‑Pacific area (de Candolle, 1886; Beccari, 1917; Vavilov, 1951; Corner, 1966; Child, 1974). According to the most widely accepted theory, the origin of coconut is in the Old World, somewhere in Southeast Asia or the Pacific Islands from where it might have been transported to other regions either by man or by sea currents. Evidences are available in literature regarding the germination capacity of coconut even after floating in the sea for a period of 110 days and within this period it is capable of travelling up to 4,900 kilometers (Edmondson, 1941). It indicates the possibility of natural dissernination between the islands in the Pacific and Indian Oceans (Harries, 1978).
References
BECCARI, O. 1919. The Palms of the Philippines Islands. Philp. J. Sci. 14 : 295 362.
BRUMAN, H. J. 1945. Early coconut culture in Western Mexico, Hispanic American Historical Review, 25 : 212 23.
CHILD, R. 1974. Coconuts (2nd Edition). Longman Group Ltd. London, 335 pp.
CORNER, E. J. H. 1996. The Natural History of Palms. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, 393 pp.
de CANDOLLE, A. 1886. Origin of Cultivated Plants. Hafner Publishing Co., New York, 428 pp.
EDMONDSON, C. H. t941. Viability of coconut seed after floating in sea. Occasional papers of Bernice. P. Bishop Museum. Honolulu, Hawaii, 16 : 293 304
HARRIES, H.C. 1978. The evolution, dissernination and classification of Cocos nucifera L. Bot. Rev. 44 : 265 319
HILL, A. W. 1929. The original home and mode of dispersal of the coconut, Nature, 124 : 133 134, 151 1 53.
IBPGR, 1978. Coconut genetic resources. IBPGR report, AGPE/IBPGR/784. 24 pp. Secretariat, Rome.
JACOB, P. M. and RAWTHER, T. S. S. 1991. Varietal resistance, pp. 67 71. In : Coconut root (wilt) disease (Ed. Nair, M.K. et al.,) Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod. 92 pp.
KAUL, K. N. 1951. A palm fruit from Kapurdi (Jodhpur, Rajasthan desert) Cocos sahnii sp.,Curr. Sci., 20 : 138.
MARTIUS, C. F. P. 1850 (1823 50). Historia Naturalis Palmarum 3 Munich.
MENON, K.P.V. and PANDALAI, K.M. 1958. The Coconut Palm a monograph. Indian Central Coconut Committee Emakulam. pp. 384.
MENON, K. S., THOMMEN, K. J. and SUKUMARAN, A. S. 1981. Varietal resistance studies. In Review of Research on Coconut root (wilt) disease. Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kayangulam. pp. 78 82 (Mimeographed).
PANDA, K. C. 1982. Coconut types of Orissa. Indian Coconut J. 13. 10 18.
PURSEGLOVE, J. W. 1972. Tropical Crops – Monocotyledons Longmans Group Ltd., London, 607 pp.
RAJAGOPAL, V., KASTURIBAI, K. V. and VOLETI, S. R. 1990. Screening of coconut genotypes for drought tolerance. Oleagineux, 45 (5) : 215 223.
RAMACHANDRAN, M., MURALIDHARAN, V. N. and BALASU BRAMANIAN, K. 1977. A note on the new coco¬nut variety Ayiramkachi, Indian Coconut J., 8: 4 6.
RAO, E. V. V. B. and KOSHY, P. K., 1982. Coconut Germplasm Collection in Pacific Ocean Islands. Deputation Report. (Mimeographed), pp. 47. Central Planta¬tion Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod.
RAO, E. V. V. B. and MATHEW JACOB, 1981. An index for evaluation of coconut germplasm in the nursery. PLACROSYM IV: pp 200 205.
RAO, E. V. V. B. and NAYAR, N. M. 1980, Documentation of coconut germplasm. Workshop on Documentation of Genetic Resources, New Delhi. pp. 5 (Mimeo¬graphed).
RAO, E. V. V. B. and PILLAI, R. V. 1982. Characterization of coconut germplasm based on fruit component analysis. PLACROSYM V pp. 112 124.
RAO, E. V. V. B., SATYABALAN, K. and MATHEW JACOB. 1978. Evaluation of ten cultivars of coconut germplasm. Abstracts of papers presented at the All India High Level Symposium Researches in Plant Cytogenetic at Andhra University, Waltair, India, 9 12 Feb. 1978. pp. 9.
ROSENGARTEN, F. (Jr.) 1984. The Book of Edible Nuts.Walker and Company, New York, 384 pp.
SATYABALAN, K. and MATHEW JACOB. 1976. Identification of prepotent palms in West Coast Tall coconuts based on the early stages of growth of the progeny in the nursery. In Coconut Research and Development pp. 15 22. Wiley Eastern Limited New Delhi.
SWAMINATHAN, M. S. and NAMBIAR, M. C. 1961. Cytology and origin of the dwarf coconut palm. Nature 192 : 85¬86.
VARGHESE, M. K. 1934. Diseases of coconut palm. Supdt. Govt. Press, Trivandrum. pp. 105.
VAVILOV, N. I. 1851. The origin, variation, immunity and breeding of cultivated plants. Chronica Botanica, 13 : 1 366.
