CHLOROPLAST DNA VARIATION IN COCONUT IS OPPOSITE TO ITS NUCLEAR DNA VARIATION

  • Lalith Perera
Keywords: Chloroplast DNA Variation, Coconut

Abstract

The pattern of world distribution of two major fruit morphotypes of coconuts has led to development of theories on origin, domestication and dissemination of coconut. Results of recent nuclear DNA analyses are in agreement with these theories with several other new insights. Compared to the plant nuclear genome however, the plant organelle genomes, the chloroplast genome and the mitochondrial genome are highly conserved and are maternally inherited in most angiosperms. Therefore, most useful information have come from regions of DNA located in organelle genome for studying phylogeny in angiosperms and for deducing historical information and evolutionary history of populations such as past migration routes and colonization dynamics. This study was aimed to determine the feasibility of developing polymorphic cytoplasmic markers, particularly the chloroplast markers. Chloroplast DNA variation of coconut from all coconut growing regions in the world assessed by both restriction digestions and physical separation of PCR products obtained with universal primers, by chloroplast microsatellites and by sequencing showed no variation. This tends to suggest that coconut may have gone through a severe cytoplasmic bottleneck and only one chloroplast type may have participated in the colonization process.

References

Clegg MT, Brown AHD, Whitfeld PR (1984b) Chloroplast DNA diversity in wild and cultivated barley - Implication and conservation. Genetic Research 43: 339-343
Clegg MT, Rawson JRY, Thomas K (1984) Chloroplast DNA variation in pearl millet and related species. Genetics 106: 449-461
Demesure B, Comps B, Petit RJ (1996) Chloroplast DNA phylogeography of the common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Europe. Evolution 50: 2515-2520
Demesure B, Sodzi N, Petit RJ (1995) A set of universal primers for amplification of polymorphic noncoding regions of mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA in plants. Molecular Ecology 4: 129-131
Dumolin S, Demesure B, Fineschi S, LeCorre V (1997b) Phylogenetic structure of white oaks throughout the European continent. Genetics 146: 1475-1487
Dumolin S, Pemonge MH, Petit RJ (1997a) An enlarged set of consensus primers for the study of organella DNA in plants. Molecular Ecology 6: 393-397
Ferris C, Oliver RP, Davy AJ, Hewitt GM (1993) Native oak chloroplasts reveal an ancient divide across Europe. Molecular Ecology 2: 337-344
Ferris C, Oliver RP, Davy AJ, Hewitt GM (1995) Using chloroplast DNA to trace postglacial migration routes of oaks into Britain. Molecular Ecology 4: 731-738
Gepts P, Clegg MT (1989) Genetic diversity in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum [L.] R. Br.) at the DNA sequence level. Journal of Heredity 80: 203-208
Harries HC (1978) The evolution dissemination and classification of Cocos nucifera L. Botanical Review 44: 205-317
King RA, Ferris C (1998) Chloroplast DNA phylogeography of Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. Molecular Ecology 7: 1151-1161
Konieczny A, Ausubel F (1993) A procedure for mapping Arabidopsis mutations using codominant ecotype specific PCR-based markers. Plant Journal 4: 403-410.
Lebrun P, N'Cho NP, Seguin M, Grivet L. Baudouin L (1998) Genetic diversity in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) revealed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers. Euphytica 101: 103-108
Orita M, Suzuki Y, Sekiya T, Hayashi K (1989) Rapid and sensitive detection of point mutations and DNA polymorphism using the polymerase chain reaction. Genomics 5: 874-879
Perera L. (1999) Assessing genetic diversity of coconut (Cocos nucifera l.) using molecular markers. Ph.D thesis. University of Dundee, UK.
Perera L, Russell JR, Provan J, Powell W (2000) Use of Microsatellite DNA markers to investigate the level of genetic diversity and population genetic structure of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.). Genome 43: 15-21
Powell W, Machray GC, Provan J (1996) Polymorphism revealed by Simple Sequence Repeats. Trends in Plant Science 1: 215-222
Powell W, Morgante M, Andre C, McNicol JW, Machray GC, Doyle JJ, Tingey SV, Rafalski JA (1995) Hypervariable microsatellites provide a general source of polymorphic DNA markers for chloroplast genome. Current Biology 5: 1023-1029
Provan J, Corbett G, McNicol JW, Powell W (1997) Chloroplast variability in wild and cultivated rice (Oryza spp.) revealed by polymorphic chloroplast simple sequence repeats. Genome 40: 104-110
Provan J, Russell JR, Booth A, Powell W (1999) Polymorphic chloroplast simple sequence repeat primers for systematic and population studies in the genus Hordeum. Molecular Ecology 8: 505-511
Provan, J, Soranzo N, Wilson NJ, McNicol JW, Morgante M, Powell W (1998) The use of uniparentally inherited simple sequence repeats in plant population studies and systematics. In: Advances in Plant Molecular Systematics. Hollingsworth P, Gornall R, Bateman R (Eds), Chapman and Hall, London. pp 35-50
Rohde W, Kullaya A, Rodriguez J, Ritter E (1995) Genome analysis of Cocos nucifera L. by PCR amplification of spacer sequences separating a subset of copia-like 16RI repetitive elements. Journal of Genetics and Breeding 49: 179-186
Sederoff RR (1987) Molecular mechanism of mitochondrial-genome evolution in higher plants. American Naturalist 130: 530-545
Soranzo N (1999) Genetic variation in native European populations of Pinus sylvestris (L.). Ph.D Thesis. University of Dundee, UK.
Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G (1991) Universal primers for amplification of 3 noncoding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109
Waters ER, Schall BA (1991) No variation is detected in the chloroplast genome of Pinus torreyana. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21: 1832-1835
Whatley, JM (1982) Ultra structure of plastid inheritance: green algae to angiosperms. Botanical Review 57: 527-569
Published
2002-12-01
How to Cite
Lalith Perera. (2002). CHLOROPLAST DNA VARIATION IN COCONUT IS OPPOSITE TO ITS NUCLEAR DNA VARIATION. CORD, 18(02), 34. https://doi.org/10.37833/cord.v18i02.359
Section
Articles