Nanocellulose from Diseased Coconut Wood Biomass

  • Jayaraj A P
  • Anita Das Ravindranath
  • Sarma U S
Keywords: Diseased coconut wood, cellulose, microcrystalline cellulose, nanocellulose


Cellulose is the most widespread biopolymer on earth. In biosynthesis, cellulose polymers aggregate to form substructures, microfibrils, which in turn aggregate to form cellulose fibers. By applying effective methods these fibers can be disintegrated into cellulose substructures with micro- or nano-size dimensions. This article covers some aspects related to the sources of cellulose micro- and nanofibers and the most important methods for their isolation. One of these methods, acid hydrolysis, was experimentally used to obtain cellulose nano-fibers from diseased coconut wood biomass. They were studied by Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffractometer (XRD) and Scanning electrom microscope (SEM).

         The  ‘Replanting and Rejuvenation of Coconut Gardens’ was the sponsored scheme of the Coconut Development Board with an objective to eliminate all disease- affected coconut palms in eight districts of  Kerala state in India. The main components of the scheme included cutting and removal of all old, unproductive and disease-hit palms followed by a replanting exercise. The present work was carried out under the Board sponsored project entitled “Diversified uses of diseased coconut wood”.

Author Biographies

Jayaraj A P

Junior Research Fellow, Department of Microbiology, Central Coir Research Institute (Coir Board), Alleppey, Kerala, India

Anita Das Ravindranath

Senior Scientific Officer, Department of Microbiology, Central Coir Research Institute (Coir Board), Alleppey, Kerala, India

Sarma U S

Advisor (R & D), Central Coir Research Institute (Coir Board), Alleppey, Kerala, India


Al-Shouiman Salim S. Furfural from Some edible plants grown in Saudi Arabia, Journal of J. King Saud Unvi 10, Science (2) 119-125 (A.H.1428/1998)
Bondeson D., Mathew A., Kristiina Oksman. 2006. Optimization of the isolation of nanocrystals from microcrystalline cellulose by acid hydrolysis. Cellulose. 13(2): 171-180.
Central Plantation Crops Research Institute (CPCRI), Kasaragod. Mycoplasma diseases of coconut with special reference to root (wilt) disease. Indian Phytopath. 52 (4): 335-353 (1999)
Chattopadhyay H., Sarkar p.B.1946, New Method for estimation of cellulose, proe Natl Inst Sci India 12 (1): 23-46.
David N.S. Hon and Nobuo Shiraishi. 2000. Wood and cellulosic chemistry 2nd edition. 282pp.
Dong S.P. and Roman M. 2007. Fluorescently labeled cellulose nanocrystals for bioimaging applications. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 129(45): 13810-13811.
Eichhorn S.J., Dufresne A., Aranguren M., Marcovich N.E., Capadona J.R., Rowan S.J., Weder C., Thielemans W., Roman M., Renneckar S., Gindl W., Veigel S., Keckes J., Yano H., Abe K., Nogi M., Nakagaito A.N., Mangalam A., Simonsen J., Benight A.S., Bismarck A., Berglund L. A., and Peijs T. 2010. Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. Journal of Materials Science, 45(1): 1- 33.
Hoenich N. 2006. Cellulose for medical applications: past, present and future. BioResources, 1(2): 270-280.
Hubbe M.A., Rojas O.J., Lucia L.A., and Sain M. 2008. Cellulosic Nanocomposites: A review. BioResources, 3(3): 929-980.
Kamel S. 2007. Nanotechnology and its applications in lignocellulosic composites, a mini review. EXPRESS Polymer Letters, 1(9): 546-575.
Laka M. and Chernyavskaya S. 2007. Obtaining microcrystalline cellulose from softwood and hard wood pulp, BioResources, 3(3): 583-589.
Moran J.I., Alvarez V.A., Cyras V.P., Vazquez A. 2008. Extraction of cellulose and preparation of nanocellulose from sisal fibers. Cellulose. 15(1): 149-159.
Perssoa JR A., Manchila IM., and Sato S. 1997. Acid Hydrolysis of Hemicellulose from Sugar cane Bagasse. Brazilian Journal of chemical engineers. 14(3): 632-636.
Ramjagtheesh R., Karthikeyan G., Rajendran L., Johnson I., Raghuchander T. & Samiyappan R. (2012), Root (wilt) disease of coconut palms in South Asia- an overview. 45 (20): 2485-2493
Rauganna S. 1977. Manual of analysis of fruits & vegetables products. CFTRI, New Delhi 324pp. AACC Method 1962, 52-11
Sadasivam S. and Manickam A. 1996. Biochemical Methods. 2nd ed. New age, 14pp.
Sarwar Hahan M., Lee Z.Z.,Yongoan JJIN et al 2006. Organic Acid Pulping of Rice Straw: Turk J. Agric. For Cooking, 30: 231-239.
Sjöström E. 1993. Wood Chemistry: Fundamentals and Applications. 2nd ed Academic Press Inc., San Diego, USA. 54pp.
Sun-Young Lee, D Jugan Mohan, In Aeh Kang, Geum-Hyun Doh, Soo Lee and Seong OK Han. 2009. Nanocellulose Reinforced PVA Composite Filims Effects of Acid treatments of Filter Loading. Journal of Fibers & polymers, 10(1): 77-82.
Vogels Aurthur I. 1957. Text Book of Practical Organic Chemistry including Qualitative Organic Analysis, 3rd ed. DSC Lond, DIC FRIC. 299pp.
Wegner T.H., Winandy J.E., and Ritter M.A. 2005. Nanotechnology opportunities in residential and non residential construction. 2nd International Symposium on Nanotechnology in Construction, Bilbao, Spania. 101-110pp.
Zimmermann T., Bordeanu N., and Strub E. 2010. Properties of nanofibrillated cellulose from different raw materials and its reinforcement potential. Carbohydrate Polymers, 79(4): 1086-1093.
How to Cite
Jayaraj A P, Anita Das Ravindranath, & Sarma U S. (2014). Nanocellulose from Diseased Coconut Wood Biomass. CORD, 30(1), 10.